Competency Level of MAPEH Teachers in Teaching Performing Arts Based on K to 12 Curriculum in Secondary Public Schools

Authors

  • Carla Jobelle Culajara Department of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52877/instabright.003.02.0036%20

Keywords:

Competency level, Performing arts, MAPEH Teachers, Curriculum, ICT

Abstract

The quality of education depends on the teacher as well as to the curriculum. As the prime movers to attain the addressed goals in the curriculum, teachers must have the desire to grow and improve through professional development and constant learning towards students ‘academic achievement. The descriptive method of research was utilized in this study to assess the competency level of the MAPEH teachers in teaching performing arts based on the K to 12 Curriculum. Results of the study revealed that majority of the respondents were females, married and 40 years old and below. They earned units/finished their master’s degree, held a teacher position, and had 10 years and below teaching experience. With regard to artistic inclinations particularly in terms of dancing, majority of them have potential in folk dance and modern dance. In terms of music, some teachers could play musical instruments skillfully such as guitar and piano/organ. They were highly competent in using assessment data, monitoring students’ data and achievement, using ICT resources for the teaching-learning process, giving feedbacks, making good use of allotted time and employing design. Individual or group experiential learning, cooperative learning, project method and collaborative activities were most commonly used strategies in teaching performing arts. Meanwhile, lack of facilities and equipment and limited seminars, workshops, and trainings attended were the common problems encountered.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-15

How to Cite

Culajara, C. J. (2021). Competency Level of MAPEH Teachers in Teaching Performing Arts Based on K to 12 Curriculum in Secondary Public Schools . Instabright International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.52877/instabright.003.02.0036